Externen Datenschutzbeauftragten gesucht?DATUREX GmbH Dresden
DATUREXDatenschutz-Gesetze
GDPR — Inhaltsverzeichnis

KI-generierte Zusammenfassung

This provision empowers the European Data Protection Board to adopt binding decisions to resolve disputes between supervisory authorities, including cases involving relevant and reasoned objections to lead authority draft decisions, competence disputes, and failures to follow Board opinions. Decisions must be adopted by two-thirds majority within one month, with extension possibilities, ensuring consistent enforcement.

Art. 65 GDPR

Dispute resolution by the Board

Kapitel 7 — Cooperation and consistency

(1.)In order to ensure the correct and consistent application of this Regulation in individual cases, the Board shall adopt a binding decision in the following cases: (a) where, in a case referred to in Article 60(4), a has raised a to a draft decision of the lead and the lead has not followed the objection or has rejected suchan objection as being not relevant or reasoned.The binding decision shall concern all the matters which are the subject of the , in particular whether there is an infringement of this Regulation; (b) where there are conflicting views on which of the supervisory authorities concerned is competent for the ; (c) where a competent does not request the opinion of the Board in the cases referred to in Article 64(1), or does not follow the opinion of the Board issued under Article 64. In that case, any or the Commission may communicate the matter to the Board.
(2.)The decision referred to in paragraph 1 shall be adopted within one month from the referral of the subject-matter by a two-thirds majority of the members of the Board. That period may be extended by a further month on account of the complexity of the subject-matter. The decision referred to in paragraph 1 shall be reasoned and addressed to the lead and all the supervisory authorities concerned and binding on them.
(3.)Where the Board has been unable to adopt a decision within the periods referred to in paragraph 2, it shall adopt its decision within two weeks following the expiration of the second month referred to in paragraph 2 by a simple majority of the members of the Board. Where the members of the Board are split, the decision shall by adopted by the vote of its Chair.
(4.)The supervisory authorities concerned shall not adopt a decision on the subject matter submitted to the Board under paragraph 1 during the periods referred to in paragraphs 2 and 3.
(5.)The Chair of the Board shall notify, without undue delay, the decision referred to in paragraph 1 to the supervisory authorities concerned. It shall inform the Commission thereof. The decision shall be published on the website of the Board without delay after the has notified the final decision referred to in paragraph 6.
(6.)The lead or, as the case may be, the with which the complaint has been lodged shall adopt its final decision on the basis of the decision referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, without undue delay and at the latest by one month after the Board has notified its decision. The lead or, as the case may be, the with which the complaint has been lodged, shall inform the Board of the date when its final decision is notified respectively to the or the and to the data subject. The final decision of the supervisory authorities concerned shall be adopted under the terms of Article 60(7), (8) and (9). The final decision shall refer to the decision referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article and shall specify that the decision referred to in that paragraph will be published on the website of the Board in accordance with paragraph 5 of this Article. The final decision shall attach the decision referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article.
Quelle:
EUR-Lex CELEX 02016R0679-20160504
Fundstelle:
OJ L 119, 04.05.2016, p. 1; corrected by OJ L 127, 23.05.2018, p. 2
Stand:
2016-05-04
Abgerufen:
2026-02-25